:: BïtS 'N' PiëCÉS :: | |
domenica, settembre 04, 2005 :: double standards ::if a man is not attached, the view is: 1. sg women too materialistic, i cannot provide her all the gadzillion C's 2. sg women not gentle enough aka shu nu 3. the angmohs took all out women away 4. sg women ask for too high standards 5. sg women are too career-minded 6. sg women are too headstrong and argue too much if a sg gal is not attached, the view is: 1. she is too materialistic, only love money, and rich men 2. she is an SPG 3. she is a bitch/snob/perpetually pms 4. she set standards that are too high 5. she is fat/ugly/ugly/ugly/ugly/fat/fat lolz... 6. no 'assets'? 7. she is too career-minded 8. she's a les see the trend? men NEVER blame themselves, they blame the women, the foreigners, the environment and the government. how come i haven't heard of gals giving reasons on why they aren't attached yet? mostly i hear, haven't found 'the one'. i propose, we have another episode of Get Real! which shows: 'Are Singaporean men (with their whining) easy to love?'
|
about me francesca chiu 2 eyebags & 5 wrinkles on long-term dormicum drip KIV IMH icq: 58631104 more... Español EJournals Cortislim taggie (There is no flooble chatterbox with this id. It may have been deleted, or never existed. You can sign up for a new account if you wish.) Epidemiology SEER IARC Classification WHO AFIP Staging AJCC UICC Treatment NCI NCCN links Navigation
archives aprile 2004 ![]() |
3 Comments:
lol.
This has made me wonder if the blame game is mostly confined to men. Of course, it has to be fueled by the media...
I LOVE THIS POST!!!!
AND I LOVE YOU SANZ!
muahaha now we can go tell pple we're not attached (yet) cuz we're LES. (temporarily la) haha...
Posta un commento
<< Home