domenica, settembre 04, 2005
:: double standards ::if a man is not attached, the view is:
1. sg women too materialistic, i cannot provide her all the gadzillion C's
2. sg women not gentle enough aka shu nu
3. the angmohs took all out women away
4. sg women ask for too high standards
5. sg women are too career-minded
6. sg women are too headstrong and argue too much
if a sg gal is not attached, the view is:
1. she is too materialistic, only love money, and rich men
2. she is an SPG
3. she is a bitch/snob/perpetually pms
4. she set standards that are too high
5. she is fat/ugly/ugly/ugly/ugly/fat/fat lolz...
6. no 'assets'?
7. she is too career-minded
8. she's a les
see the trend?
men NEVER blame themselves, they blame the women, the foreigners, the environment and the government.
how come i haven't heard of gals giving reasons on why they aren't attached yet? mostly i hear, haven't found 'the one'.
i propose, we have another episode of Get Real! which shows: 'Are Singaporean men (with their whining) easy to love?'
about me
francesca chiu
2 eyebags & 5 wrinkles
on long-term dormicum drip
KIV IMH
icq: 58631104
more...
Español
EJournals
Cortislim
taggie
Epidemiology
SEER
IARC
Classification
WHO
AFIP
Staging
AJCC
UICC
Treatment
NCI
NCCN
links
Navigation
Emedicine
MuggerLand
"Survivor"
Blogarama
Blog Directory
Rice Bowl Journals
Technorati Profile
archives
aprile 2004
maggio 2004
giugno 2004
luglio 2004
agosto 2004
settembre 2004
ottobre 2004
novembre 2004
dicembre 2004
gennaio 2005
febbraio 2005
marzo 2005
aprile 2005
maggio 2005
giugno 2005
luglio 2005
agosto 2005
settembre 2005
ottobre 2005
3 Comments:
lol.
This has made me wonder if the blame game is mostly confined to men. Of course, it has to be fueled by the media...
I LOVE THIS POST!!!!
AND I LOVE YOU SANZ!
muahaha now we can go tell pple we're not attached (yet) cuz we're LES. (temporarily la) haha...
Posta un commento
<< Home